Just had a rather stupid exchange with a person from my past. Well, this post might remind him of the things he supposed to know, having took a major in philosophy.
PS. That exchange exhausted me.
Our arguments depend on assumptions. We prefer these assumptions to be intuitive and coherent with our other justified beliefs rather than counterintuitive and incompatible with our other justified beliefs. We might not be able to fully explain how we know “1+1=2” but we find it to be an intuitive belief, and we think it’s absurd (and perhaps incoherent) to deny that it’s true. Intuitive arguments are not only very common in philosophy, but it’s possible that all our justifications are grounded in intuition in one way or another.
View original post 1,892 more words